HOW
STELLA
GOT HER GROOVE
BACK

Groovy Stella |
Cast: Angela Bassett, Taye Diggs, Whoopi Goldberg, Regina King,
Suzzanne Douglas, Michael J. Pagan
Director: Kevin Rodney Sullivan
Producer: Deborah Schindler
Screenplay: Ron Bass and Terry McMillan based on the novel by Terry McMillan
Cinematography: Jeffrey Jur
Music:
Michael Columbier
Australian distributor: Twentieth Century Fox
Australian theatrical
release date: November 26 |
|
|
| When their initial thoughts and ideas have been developed,
scriptwriters are often faced with the well-known problem of what to do next. From
previous examples, weve discovered that writers can introduce new characters, change
the setting drastically or yield an unexpected scenario anything except lay
down their guns and die. But in the case of How Stella Got Her Groove Back, no
innovative artillery was ever loaded. And around half way through the film, I was left
open-jawed as I witnessed a horribly under written first half transform into a horribly
over written second. The first example of how badly under written the beginning of
Terry McMillans script is lies in the title of the film. When
it reads How Stella Got Her Groove Back, one must pose the question of whether she
lost it in the first place. Stella (Angela Bassett) is an amazingly attractive 40-year-old
who has a respectable job, which rakes in the dollars. When she takes a much-needed
holiday, Stella picks up a 21-year-old Jamaican man, Winston (Taye Diggs), and eventually
takes him back home. This in itself is not too much to digest, as the notion of suspending
disbelief is welcomed in a romantic fantasy of this sort. But McMillan expects us to
believe that Stellas "groove" is gone by simply piecing together a few
scenes of her at work, and quoting a few lines of dialogue about her having to get out
more. A major oversight arent the words Im looking for a half assed
job, perhaps, are better.
By the time the second half begins, were already more than just a little fed up.
Stella and Winston sing a boring chorus of "should we or should we not stay
together", and that ultimately lasts for the rest of the ordeal.
The fact that I saw one of the first prints of this film in Australia is nothing for me
to gloat about. Of the thirteen or so viewers in the cinema, only four including me
were left seated for its final moments. And who can blame them, since this
punishing ordeal never relents from butt numbing boredom.
To demonstrate the weaknesses in McMillans screenplay, the films gags are
simply not funny, and its most serious moments are way too funny. An ambulance
driver casually talking on a phone whilst a patient suffers inside is not my idea of
humor, and my idea of a serious moment does not involve two adults arguing about whether
or not they should stay together for the tenth time. Thats why I can easily imagine
why McMillans novel (of the same name) would be a much more pleasurable experience.
At least, you could probably take it seriously.
|