|
production info |
Cast:
Ewan
McGregor, Hayden
Christensen, Natalie
Portman, Ian McDiarmid,
Samuel L. Jackson, Jimmy
Smits, Frank Oz, Anthony
Daniels, Christopher Lee,
Kenny Baker, Peter Mayhew,
James Earl-Jones (voice)
Director:
George
Lucas
Producer:
Rick
McCallum
Screenplay:
George Lucas
Cinematography:
David Tattersall
Music:
John Williams
Australian theatrical
release date:
May 12, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
poster
|
|
|
|
Star Wars fans, rejoice.
George Lucas' bombastic
space soap opera thunders through its sixth
instalment in Episode 3: Revenge of the Sith,
a dazzling and gorgeously rendered send-off to one
of cinema's most beloved science fiction franchises.
In this eclectic mash of superhero ethos and digital
wizardry Lucas at last rekindles his ability to
tickle the imaginations of his viewers, a gift which
has remained sadly dormant in his career for the
good part of two decades. His last substantial
film was Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
(1989), which he produced.
Recent fluffy
predecessors Episode 1:
The Phantom Menace and
Episode 2: Attack of the
Clones led Lucas to the dark side
of formulaic filmmaking, in which cuddly Happy Meal
graphics characterised the appearance of his
new-generation movies while superfluous set pieces
and long-winded back stories watered down their
content into shiny globs of throwaway pulp.
It's now easier for
detractors of Episodes 1 and 2 (myself included) to
find some solace in identifying those two chapters
as the black sheep of the Star Wars saga: the
two chunks of the pie unable to strike a satisfying
mixture that could stir franchise babble, special
effects and story into the same pot without
overloading the formula. Here the portions are
just about right and, god bless, Jar Jar Binks
doesn't utter a single word of dialogue.
Presumably George has been paying close attention to
his test-screening cards, which makes me wonder why
he didn't realise that light-sabre slicing Jar-Jar
into a carved up mess moments before the end credits
rolled would have scored through the roof.
In terms of an ability
to design blockbuster films for blanket universal
audiences Lucas is one of the world's most intuitive
filmmakers, which is both a blessing and a curse for
the artistry of his work. Here he swims
against the tide, with two cruddy duds bogging down
his recent reputation, legions of audiences
restlessly hankering to be filled in on the missing
details of the Star Wars universe, and with a
plot working towards a bunch of resolutions that
essentially have already been written.
Remarkably, this Star
Wars outfit sees Lucas -- one of tinsel
town's fundamental engineers of the blockbuster
module -- breaking one of the studio system's golden
rules, which says that a Hollywood movie must have a
happy ending. Taking all the films into
account, Lucas' vision as a whole certainly ends
happily -- who could forget those fireworks-filled
Ewok celebrations at the end of Return of the
Jedi (1983) -- but for a high-calibre film such as
this, forcing audiences to look outside of the text
for a reaffirming conclusion to its grim dramatics
is a bold manoeuvre. A large part of that is
purely the structure of the Star Wars
storyline, and this particular instalment has been
designated as the darkest in tone. We know
that Chancellor Palpatine becomes the Emperor, we
know that Anikan transforms into Darth Vader, and we
know that some horrible accident leaves him
wretchedly disfigured. We know also that the
good guys will lose the battle but, three films down
the track, will win
the war.
But we don't know the
specifics and it's the hows and whys and the small
details attached that keep the ball rolling
throughout Revenge of the Sith. The
film sports a running time of almost two and half
hours but the pace is fast, slick and smooth, and
with a minimal amount of the political mumbo-jumbo
jargon that haunted the dialogue of the previous two
instalments.
The storyline is still
thin -- Star Wars is a space soap opera after
all -- but the plotting in Revenge of the Sith
is dense and busied and moves between junctions
nimbly and efficiently, with a jolting rhythm that
sustains itself well over the course of its running
time. Best of all, at the end of it you don't
come away with that overpowering sense of sugary
sweetness or "go buy me!" merchandising appeal.
It is the first Star Wars instalment since
Return of the Jedi that actually feels
like the genuine article.
The Empire Strikes
Back (1980) which is rightfully regarded as the
superlative Star Wars movie, proved
that a SFX-happy superhero film set in space could
still pack a strong dramatic punch. Similarly
the tonal change here demonstrates the material's
potential for stagy, grand-scale personal dramas and
conflicts -- love and betrayal and a litany of other
emotions set in front of the fire of wars and
revolution, where heroes and villains play on both
sides and their adventures are accentuated by a
sense of fallen dynasties, misguided morals,
goodness and evil.
There is a brooding
cloak of darkness that overshadows Revenge of the
Sith, hanging like an ominous grey sky looming
above a picturesque lagoon -- silently threatening
to boil over any time into a storm of doom, but
still part of a scenic horizon that carries with it
a prevailing sense of splendour and wholesomeness.
Lucas has always been a technically orientated
director, much more able to get his mind around
architecture, effects and sets than writing
and direction, but here the story threads nicely
and the nooks and crannies and
finer strokes of Lucas' canvas buzz from the
heightened sense of atmosphere, something that was only
primitively developed in the two previous episodes.
Even if Lucas does have
the tendency to go over board -- too often favouring
compositions that look like frenzied screensavers
rather than creative use of the frame -- the girth
and magnitude of his work can be gob smacking.
With a more theatrical sense of character and plot
riffs, and with a seriousness in its tone and a
swift dramatic arc, the surface of Revenge of the
Sith can be appreciated without feeling
that it's merely serving as a tool for misdirection,
diverting eyes away from ailing storylines.
This one shoots along on relentlessly.
Yes, you'll see Yoda
kick some ass -- but continues to fail, he does, at
basic English. Expect a birth scene, expect an
operating table scene, and expect a number of bumps
and thrills along the way. General Grievous, a
nefarious cyborg with four arms and four light
sabres, makes a more imposing villain than Darth
Maul, but then again they all do. How many
blockbuster movies have you seen with three primary
characters as villains and two of them win in the
end? This is a film built entirely around the
concept of finalising another narrative's
back-story. Considering we know where all the
roads lead, making the ride there such a buzz is an
achievement in itself.
Revenge of the Sith
is reminiscent of both the virtues and the
shortcomings of the original films: overtly hammy
and po-faced on one hand, deliriously fun on the
other.
. |