Review: Three Blind Mice

Three Blind Mice

Matt Ravier reports from the 2008 Sydney Film Festival. Three Blind Mice is a confident and extremely promising debut for writer-director Matthew Newton and a treasure trove of local talent, both fresh and firmly established.

Apart from seeing him on stage in Tom Stoppard’s excellent Rock ‘n Roll, I’m not overly familiar with actor Matthew Newton’s work, nor that of his friends and colleagues. Perhaps if I were from around here I’d understand better why so many seemed to want them to fail (perhaps someone can enlighten me in the comments?). Many Australians seem to have a love-hate relationship with success. Is it that local audiences find it hard to recompense the work of clever, over-privileged white boys from the Eastern Suburbs? Rumour has it that amongst the five jury members, it was the three foreigners who pushed for the film to be awarded a special mention…

I found this tightly scripted semi-improvisational drama to be engrossing and ultimately quite moving. Clearly inspired by John Cassavettes (by way perhaps of Andrew Bujalski?), the film takes an old fashioned premise - three marines hitting the town for one last night before being shipped off to war - and makes it feel fresh and authentic thanks to vibrant, off-the-cuff dialogue and excitingly raw performances.

Unfolding over the course of one emotional night, the film follows three Royal Australian Navy soldiers as they attempt to get laid, bid goodbye to their city and make some sense of their life before it is put at risk in the Gulf.

Matthew Newton, Ewen Leslie and Toby Schmitz are excellent as the three buddies, allowing their characters - the party animal, the sensitive guy and the dark horse - to come of age over only a few hours without asking the audience to suspend disbelief. They are served by superbly written set pieces which come alive with the unadulterated spontaneity of authentic-sounding dialogue.

These exchanges, which occasionally overlap, randomly explode in blisteringly funny moments of dark comedy. Newton tackles some difficult personal issues with the lightest of touches. In this respect, he adopts a resolutely Australian tone, never too careful in his insistence not to take things too seriously.

Australian journalist and festival programmer Shane Danielsen had this to say about local competition entries Three Blind Mice and The Square:

“Though markedly dissimilar in style, what these two films shared was a fascination, bordering almost upon the forensic, with what it meant to be a man, and to live and act in a male-dominated world (…). For some of us, though, they offered hope that, after more than a decade in which Australian cinema - at least in its international manifestations - became synonymous with camp, caricature and superficiality, there was a willingness on the part of filmmakers to once again engage with something resembling real life, and to address actual human emotions. With nary a sequin or red velvet curtain in sight.”

Beyond this statement’s dubious undertones, I disagree with the implication that the unmentioned films alluded to here, in all their camp, sequined superficiality, weren’t also addressing notions of Australian masculinity, and engaging, under cover of spectacle, with the “actual human emotions” of this so-called “real life”.

Three Blind Mice wouldn’t know what to do with a velvet curtain, concerned as it is with the unadorned immediacy of the here and now. It’s a film about men coming to terms with their masculinity, sure, but first and foremost it’s a film about boys trying to find out what kind of decisions they want to be making as adults.

In any case there’s no disputing that the male protagonists of Three Blind Mice are recognizably Australian, and not very different from the blokes you and I may know and hang out with down the pub. Newton has given his characters depth without giving up their boy-next-door authenticity, and he’s given them complexity without compromising on their blokey nature.

We should be thankful for the energy and talent of Matthew Newton and his friends. A trip on the international festival circuit, where this kind of cinema is often taken a little more seriously than by Sydney’s cultural commentators, might wipe that smug smile off their face, but in the meantime they should be celebrating. This is the kind of Australian cinema we should get excited about.

Review by Matt Ravier
Cast: Matthew Newton, Brendan Cowell, Alex Dimitriades, Bob Franklin, Barry Otto, Pia Miranda, Ewen Leslie, Toby Schmitz, Tina Bursill
Director: Matthew Newton
Screenplay: Matthew Newton
Three Blind Mice is currently without Australian distribution
Bookmark and Share:

8 Comment(s)

  1. Hi Matt,

    I haven’t seen Three Blind Mice but your review and another that led me here make me want to.

    Moulin Rouge remains my favourite Australian film - not perfect by any means, of course but what is? I will never understand why more Australian film professionals could not embrace, enjoy and celebrate it for what it was: A magnificent, opulent, tremendous, stupendous, gargantuan, bedazzlement, a ssssenssssual ravishment. In fact: Spectacular!

    Man, I love a gritty urban drama where the hero you have come to love spends his time shooting up and vomiting while his girlfriend dies as much as the next guy - all shot in blues and blacks of course - but surely there’s room for sequins and larrikans as well.

    Christine Langtree

    Christine Langtree | Aug 8, 2009 | Reply

  2. I haven’t seen the film, but the fact that these actors are portraying Officers of the RAN, why are their medals and badges on the wrong side, One is wearing a Petty Officer’s cap and one has rank on his sleeve that doesn’t exist in the Navy.

    RAN doesn’t have soldiers they are called sailors.
    The film is about Naval Officers not sailors.

    Maybe the director should have spent some time at Garden Island and asked a few questions about the Navy.

    Eddie | Aug 20, 2009 | Reply

  3. Eddie

    Lighten up - it’s not inspection parade - it’s a movie that’s fantastic. Saw it tonight with Matthew Newton there. In twenty years of serivce I reckon I met his character quite a few times. More power to him, the cast and the producers. not a dud or cringe moment in the whole movie.

    I reckon they deliberately put the medals on the wrong side to add dynamic tension in a post- modern comment on the futility of war to refute the hegemony of the super powers.

    Either that, or they @#$%^ up - who cares anyway?

    Cheers
    Bill

    Bill | Aug 29, 2009 | Reply

  4. Eddie (Aug 20 2009) - get over the nitpicking and go and see the film. It is great - Matt Newton deserves high praise for direction and screenplay. Other actors also deliver fine performances.

    I loved it.

    Annette | Sep 8, 2009 | Reply

  5. This film deserves more attention than it has gotten from the movie critics and audience in general. The movie kept me interested throughout, and the actors all played their parts well. For a movie that I thought was going to be about the travesties of war, its more of a coming of age flick with the trials and tribulations of life’s experiences amplified in a believable and well cast manner. It all comes together in the credits as we see each of the actors faces one last time, not unlike watching a friend go off to war.

    David Henschel | Jan 13, 2010 | Reply

  6. You would think that someone who is doing a movie about the Navy would at least do some research especially about the uniforms and rank structure. This was absolutely appauling. Firstly Mat comes in wearing a lieutenant Commanders shirt and is then seen in a sublieutenants jacket. Another comes in wearing a Leading seamans uniform and is then in a sublieutenants uniform and is later talking about being promoted to petty officer while wearing a Chief Petty Officers rank insignia on his shirt. Their ribbons are also being worn on the right side and not the left. Do some research and get it right!!!!

    Steve Buck | Feb 11, 2010 | Reply

  7. How do I get a copy of Three Blind Mice?

    Thank you

    Terri

    Terri Lee | May 31, 2010 | Reply

  8. I’ve just caught about ten minutes of this on Austar. That was five minutes too much but I sat for the extra five minutes in stunned disbelief to see if it got any better. This should be called a fantasy movie, as it has absolutely no connection with any Navy I know of. (I was in the Royal Navy for 25 years and Royal Australian Navy for 20.) Certainly not the RAN. The uniforms are wrong, and the script is factually laughable. Maybe the story was worth sticking around for, but ten minutes was more than enough for me. If this is the best the Australian film industry can come up it’s no wonder it’s foundering.
    Bill may think it’s a post-modern comment, I think it’s just sloppy and unprofessional film making. If they can’t get the context correct why should I bother about the content?
    And, Matt Ravier, “Australian Navy SOLDIERS?” It’s keelhauling and flogging around the Fleet for you, bucko.

    John

    John Dugard | Aug 25, 2010 | Reply

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.